What do you get when you study how to be good at procrastinating – but then actually uncover insight into the human psyche?
Read MoreApril Fools! When Scientists Get it Wrong
Five stories of tomfoolery in science
Read MoreIs Gay Blood Bad?
Would you accept a blood donation from a gay man if it meant saving your life?
Read More
The history of science is full of examples of discovery, both intentional and accidental. But how do scientists study subject matter incapable of being explained by simple models? And additionally, if science can produce favorable results (say, in the clinic), to what extent does it matter whether or not the results can be fully explained? Here, Siddhant Iyer outlines the ways in which scientists may study as-of-yet unexplained phenomena and argues for a framework involving the use of complex models while also acknowledging limitations.